Editorial policy
Last updated: 2026-03-02
glpzoom publishes editorial content about telehealth services, prescription medications, and treatment options for weight management, sexual health, hair loss, and other consumer health categories. Our goal is to help readers make informed decisions. This is the process we use.
Who writes our content
Editorial content is produced by the glpzoom editorial team. We are not clinicians and we do not give medical advice; our job is to summarize current evidence, label every source, and make the information readers need to choose a program accessible. Where an individual writer is credited by name, that byline reflects a real person.
How we review our content
Clinical content is reviewed against primary sources — FDA prescribing information, peer-reviewed trial publications, and specialty-society guidelines — before publication and whenever those sources change. The exact sources we check against, tier by tier, are documented on our how we review page.
When a page has been reviewed by a named, licensed clinician, that page shows the reviewer's name, credentials, and a licensure-verification link. We attribute a review to a named person only when a real, verifiable clinician has signed off; otherwise the review is attributed to the glpzoom editorial team at the organization level. We never publish fabricated reviewer identities or credentials.
Review cadence
Each clinical page shows a “last reviewed” date. That date means the content was checked against the sources above for the current cycle. Pages that summarize rapidly changing information — pricing, formulary status, recall notices — are re-checked more frequently and dated explicitly. The date is a sourcing claim, not a claim that a clinician personally re-read that page on that day.
How we cite evidence
Where we make a specific clinical claim (e.g., "~15% body weight loss in STEP-1 trial"), we cite the underlying source — typically the FDA prescribing information, a peer-reviewed clinical trial publication, or a guideline from a major medical body. We avoid citing secondary or tertiary sources for clinical facts; the goal is to give readers a path to verify our claims.
Separation of editorial and revenue
glpzoom earns affiliate revenue when readers click through and become customers of telehealth services we review (see our affiliate disclosure). To protect editorial integrity:
- Affiliate commission rates do not affect ranking, scoring, or inclusion decisions. We publish reviews of services that pay us nothing and decline to publish reviews of services we wouldn't recommend, regardless of payout.
- Editorial staff cannot see real-time commission data when writing or updating reviews.
- Negative findings are published even when the service in question is a paying affiliate partner.
- Affiliate links carry
rel="sponsored nofollow"and route through our tracking endpoint (/go/) so search engines and readers can identify them clearly.
Corrections and updates
We correct factual errors as soon as we identify them. When we make a substantive correction to a published page, we update the "Last reviewed" date and, for material corrections (changing an answer, withdrawing a recommendation, fixing a price or dose), we add a dated correction note at the bottom of the page. Minor typos, grammar fixes, and stylistic updates do not trigger correction notes.
See our corrections policy for the full process and to submit a correction.
What we don't do
- We do not provide medical advice, prescribe medications, or treat patients. glpzoom is an editorial and comparison platform.
- We do not handle protected health information (PHI) or take any action requiring HIPAA compliance.
- We do not promote off-label use of medications. When we discuss off-label use (e.g., Ozempic for weight loss), we label it explicitly and note that such use requires clinical judgment.
- We do not accept sponsored content or paid placements that aren't clearly labeled as such.
Contact
Editorial questions, corrections, or concerns: [email protected].